Cause =

Every possible thing any person could possibly say can be denied or debated against with an infinite number of abstract points. The stupidest part about those arguments is the fact that we all live in this world together, with modes of speech and behavior, to interact on the same level. If we use complete abstractions to argue against people and points they make, it has no application in this world. If I were to say that "the world is unbalanced emotionally, as proven in the crisis in Africa", someone could potentially say "no, the good is taken for granted and even kids in Darfur have equal happiness because their brief moments of happiness, in their eyes, are equal to events that we take for granted in our everyday lives (such as acquiring one meal in days)". I think that this is completely idealistic and completely stupid and untrue for multiple reasons. First of all, they cannot gauge how others feel. Secondly, the scale used to measure this is completely objective, making it so everything so BECOMES balanced with no mathematical evidence or even BASIS in experience. If such were true, nothing would need to be done. In context of what to do, and ideals, such concepts are useless and detrimental. There are dozens more that share the same belief sets. Alot of religious beliefs also stunt progress in the context in which we are living. It's truly unbelievable. Fucking ridiculous.